Introduction
When considering vision correction surgery, Malaysians often weigh the options of ICL and LASIK. Both procedures have their benefits, but the choice depends on factors such as prescription strength, eye health, and personal preferences. This guide compares ICL and LASIK to help you make an informed decision, highlighting the advantages of Medennium Phakic Lens (MPL).
ICL vs LASIK: Key Differences
- Procedure: LASIK reshapes the cornea, while ICL implants a lens inside the eye.
- Suitability: LASIK is best for mild to moderate prescriptions, while ICL is ideal for high myopia or astigmatism, especially in people with thin corneas.
- Recovery: ICL offers a faster recovery with less risk of dry eyes, while LASIK may require more recovery time.
- Cost: LASIK tends to be more affordable, but ICL provides longer-lasting results for people with high prescriptions.
Why Choose MPL for ICL Surgery?
- Advanced Solution: MPL is designed for high-precision results, offering superior visual outcomes for people with severe refractive errors.
- Long-Term Benefits: MPL is removable, customizable, and provides a flexible solution for future vision correction needs.
Conclusion
ICL surgery is the better choice for Malaysians with high prescriptions or those not suitable for LASIK. With the Medennium Phakic Lens (MPL), patients can enjoy superior vision correction, faster recovery, and long-term results.
